Showing posts with label Bolton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bolton. Show all posts

Thursday, May 8, 2008

John Bolton: might Bush bomb Iran? "Yes, definitely!"

Think Progress
Thursday, May 8, 2008

In a Fox News interview this afternoon, former UN Ambassador John Bolton discussed his desire to bomb camps inside Iran that are reportedly training and arming Shiite insurgents who fight in Iraq. Fox host Martha McCallum asked, "Can you imagine a scenario where President Bush would do that before the end of his term?" Bolton responded, "I think so, definitely." He added later, "This is entirely responsible on our part." Watch it:

Video Link: http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2008/080508Bolton.htm

Asked by McCallum whether Israel would be supportive of the strikes given the possibility of Iranian retaliation, Bolton responded, "I think they'd be delighted."

Thursday, September 20, 2007

Bolton: US would support preemptive Israeli strike on Iran

by John Byrne

President Bush's former United Nations ambassador John Bolton said the United States would stand behind a pre-emptive strike by Israel against countries developing "WMD facilities."

In his remark, printed in Tuesday's edition of the Israeli daily Yediot Achronot, Bolton directly referenced Iran.

"The greatest concern is to prevent Iran and other countries in the region from acquiring nuclear weapons," Bolton said, according to JTA.org, a Jewish news service. "We're talking about a clear message to Iran -- Israel has the right to self-defense --and that includes offensive operations against WMD facilities that pose a threat to Israel. The United States would justify such attacks."

Bolton's remarks follow an Israeli airstrike on Syria Sept. 6 against what US officials described as an effort to attack nuclear material the country had received from North Korea.

"Nobody thinks the use of force is an attractive option," Bolton continued, according to a second report. "But let's come down to the real question: is the use of force as an alternative preferable to Iran having nuclear weapons? No question about it, in my view."

Bolton added that any Iranian strike would involve a "limited" airstrike on uranium enrichment targets rather than an invasion like Iraq. He disagreed with retired Gen. John Abizaid who said today, "“I believe that we have the power to deter Iran, should it become nuclear.”

Bolton demurred.

"The notion that living under the threat of a possible use of Iranian nuclear weapons ... may appeal to some people but it's not the kind of life I want to live and I don't think it's the kind of life that people in Israel, for example, or other American friends and allies in the region are happy to live with," he said.

Asked whether Israel has the capability to strike Iran, he added, "In fact it's so clear that on the MIT website there's a paper by two individuals that detail from open sources just exactly how the Israelis could do it."

The following video is from Australian Broadcasting's Lateline, broadcast on September 18.



(Note: I cannot decide whether John Bolton is simply a raving lunatic, or whether he just feeds the Neocon Party's propaganda line to a public assumed to be both stupid and ignorant. The fact that he could compare the (UN condemned and illegal) Israeli airstrike on the Iraqi nuclear reactor in Tammuz (Osirak) in 1981 to what an attack on Iran's civilian nuclear program in 2007 would entail certainly shows that he has no understanding whatsoever of military issues. Judging by his comment about Australia "following" New Zealand shows that he is not much of a diplomat either - VS)

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Bolton: U.S. backs Israeli pre-emption

The Jewish Telegraphic Agency reports that John Bolton said America would back Israeli strikes against neighboring nuclear aspirants.

The United States would stand behind any pre-emptive attack by Israel on neighboring countries believed to have nuclear weapons programs, former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton said in an interview published Tuesday in the Israeli daily Yediot Achronot.

Bolton's remarks following Israel's alleged air raid Sept. 6 in Syria is consistent with longstanding U.S. suspicions that Damascus had received nuclear material from North Korea.

Israel has not formally commented on the incident, which has stirred speculation that a pre-emptive attack on Iran's nuclear facilities could be next. Bolton said such actions would find support in Washington.

"The greatest concern is to prevent Iran and other countries in the region from acquiring nuclear weapons," Bolton said. "We're talking about a clear message to Iran -- Israel has the right to self-defense --and that includes offensive operations against WMD facilities that pose a threat to Israel. The United States would justify such attacks."

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

The Imperial noose tightens around Gaza

Intense consultations have been taken place between top Imperial representatives and Fatah thugs (the USA are, as pretty much everybody already knows, deeply involved in the anti-Hamas operations). Today, Imperial forces have made several deep incursions into the Gaza strip. According to at least one Palestinian news agency, this is actually an invasion of Gaza. I personally doubt this very much, but this could well be the first preparatory phase of a full-scale invasion.

In the meanwhile top US Neocon John Bolton has stated that sanctions and diplomacy have failed and it may be too late for internal opposition to oust the Islamist regime, leaving only military intervention to stop Iran's drive to nuclear weapons. He added that he was "very worried" about the well-being of Israel. If he were in Israel's predicament, he said, "I'd be pushing the US very hard. I am pushing the US [administration] very hard, from the outside, in Washington."

(Bolton is, of course, quite correct about one thing: no "internal opposition" is going to "oust" anyone from power in Iran)

In the meantime, and on a lighter note, here is a small quiz: in which country in the Middle East does a religious radio station ban a male singer because his voice is "too feminine" and thus forbidden as pious man are forbideen to listen to female voices?

Taliban controlled Afghanistan? "Mullah" ruled Iran? Wahabi Saudi Arabia?

Nope.

Israel.

But in all fairness to the "only democratic state in the Middle-East" something like that could also have happened under the Talibans.

Friday, June 22, 2007

Jerusalem Post reveals the Neocon roots of HR 21

In an interesting background analysis, the Jerusalem Post has revealed that influential Canadian and US Neocons supporters acting on behalf of the Israeli PR spin-doctors are behind the infamous House Resolution 21 almost unanimuosly adopted by Congress (with only Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich voting against it).

-------

Analysis: Congress vs Ahmadinejad



The 411-2 vote by the US House of Representatives to implore the UN Security Council to charge Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad with violating the 1948 Genocide Convention represents a significant milestone in the campaign to use the instruments of international law against Teheran.

The legislation is nonbinding, but it clearly makes a legal determination that Ahmadinejad has engaged in "incitement to commit genocide" through his call that Israel be "wiped off the map."

The initiative to see the Iranian president indicted under the Genocide Convention began in New York on December 14, when former Canadian justice minister Irwin Cotler and Harvard Law Prof. Alan Dershowitz joined outgoing US ambassador to the UN John Bolton and an Israeli legal team at an event sponsored by the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations and the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs at the New York Bar Association's offices.

Cotler's involvement was critical because, as Canada's attorney-general, he actually prosecuted Rwandan Hutus in Canada under the Genocide Convention for their involvement in broadcasting repeated calls over the radio for the massacres that led to the deaths of over 800,000 Rwandans, chiefly from the Tutsi tribe.

For Cotler, who still serves in the Canadian Parliament, Ahmadinejad's rhetoric was "as direct and public, clear and compelling" case of incitement to genocide as he had ever seen. And what made the Iranian declarations chilling, he explained, was Tehran's ongoing determination to acquire nuclear weapons, at all costs.

The case against Ahmadinejad picked up steam internationally. On January 25, two British MPs, Michael Gove (Conservative) and Gisela Stuart (Labor), invited former prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu, Cotler, and an Israeli legal team from the Jerusalem Center to appear in the House of Commons along with Lord David Trimble, who had won the Nobel Peace Prize for his involvement in Northern Ireland. The event and the lobbying it created had a definite impact.

As of Thursday, 69 members of Parliament had signed onto a motion that "urges the British Government to put forward a resolution at the United National Security Council demanding President Ahmadinejad be brought to trial on the charge of incitement to commit genocide."

On March 5, the Australian shadow foreign minister, Robert McClelland, also called on the UN Security Council to initiate legal proceedings at the International Court of Justice in The Hague, against Ahmadinejad for incitement to genocide.

A month later, the Canadian Parliament's Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on International Human Rights adopted a motion by Cotler to refer Ahmadinejad's genocidal incitement to the Security Council, in order that the International Court of Justice investigate and actually prosecute the Iranian president. Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, who has characterized Ahmadinejad's rhetoric's as genocidal, will be critical for moving this initiative further in Ottawa.

The international community is not about to see Ahmadinejad in the seat of former Yugoslav and Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic in The Hague next week or next month. But the growing consensus that the Iranian president's statements constitute an actual breach of the Genocide Convention is still significant.

And beginning with Florida, more than a half dozen states across the US have considered adopting legislation requiring state pension funds to divest from companies doing business with Iran. Much of the original momentum behind this idea comes from efforts by individual states to divest from companies doing business in Sudan, because of its campaign of genocide over the last three years against the residents of Darfur.

The effort to divest from companies operating in Sudan due to the Darfur genocide is extremely important, but it should be broadened to divest from genocide, as a principle, wherever it has occurred. The legal determination that Ahmadinejad is indeed violating the Genocide Convention, through his repeated acts of incitement, should now be used to create a global alliance for punishing those who engaged in genocide in the past as well as those declaring their intent to carry it out in the future.

For years, Iran and its allies have tried to systematically delegitimize the State of Israel through fictitious charges about "Israeli war crimes." The time has come for Israel to counter with a campaign of its own, which unlike the accusations of its adversaries, is firmly grounded in international law and a growing consensus of increasingly significant international opinion.

The author, Israel's former ambassador to the UN, is president of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs.

-------

Now, let's make sense of all this. Let's begin with Irwin Cotler, a former President and Chief Council of the Canadian Jewish Congress (a kind of Canadian AIPAC), who is one of the inventors of the theory of "New anti-Semitism", a fraud denounced by Norman Finkelstein as a myth and a fraud (in his book Beyond Chutzpah and in debates on DemocracyNow) and by Raul Hilberg (who called it totally absurd).


Next comes Harvard Law Prof. Alan Dershowitz. He is, of course, best known for getting OJ Simpson off the hook. Dershowitz is also a recipient of the William O. Douglas First Amendment Award from the Anti-Defamation League of the B'nai Brith. He has been awarded honorary doctorates in law from Yeshiva University, the Hebrew Union College, Monmouth College, University of Haifa and Bar-Ilan University. He is the author of the book "The Case for Israel" (a good companion book to which is "The Case Against Israel" by Michael Neumann). Although Alan Derzhowitz is often referred to as a "civil rights lawyer", he openly advocates legalized torture. Dershowitz also specializes in defaming and even persecuting Jews who do not agree with Israeli policies such as Israel Shahak, Noam Chomsky and, recently, Norman Finkelstein who exposed Dershowitz as a plagiarist and fabricator on Democracy Now (full transcript, video). In a clear act of revenge, Dershowitz used his influence to have De Paul university deny tenure to Finkelstein.

And then there is John Bolton. Currently a at the infamour American Enterprise Institute, John Bolton is one of the few - but highly influential - non-Jewish Neocons. Bolton was such a universally despised creature that even the reflexively genuflecting 109th Congress clearly refused to accept his nomination as US Ambassador to the United Nations.

So that is the "unholy trinity" which stands behind the warmongering House Resolution 21.

The point of all that? Dore Gold clearly states:

"For years, Iran and its allies have tried to systematically delegitimize the State of Israel through fictitious charges about "Israeli war crimes." The time has come for Israel to counter with a campaign of its own, which unlike the accusations of its adversaries, is firmly grounded in international law and a growing consensus of increasingly significant international opinion"

So here we have it: this is yet another attempt to shift the attention away from the policies of Israel (Norman Finkelstein always points out that as soon as Israel is in trouble politically, its supporters start yelling about a "new anti-Semitism").

Not only that, but by calling it a "campaign of its own" Dore Gold clearly shows that all those in Congress who voted for this Resolution are doing the bidding of Israel by helping it in what is essentially a PR campaign.

We can be assured that the anti-anti-Semitism frenzy wil reach its climax soon and that by the time the Empire strikes on Iran the outrage over "existential threat to Israel" will have reached a new apogee.

In the meantime, the Israeli Air Force is training for air strikes on Iran.