Submitted by The Needle Blog on ZeroHedge 
Why I Don't Vote
 Democracy has become a religion and anyone who criticises it is labelled a heretic.
How
 many times have you heard the mantra that ‘if you don’t vote, you can’t
 complain’? Whereas, actually, the opposite is true, ‘if you do vote, 
you can’t complain.’ It is no coincidence that the emergence of the 
philosophical concept of the ‘Social Contract’ runs parallel to 
democratic development in the modern era.
Democracy has become a religion and anyone who criticises it is labelled a heretic.
How
 many times have you heard the mantra that ‘if you don’t vote, you can’t
 complain’? Whereas, actually, the opposite is true, ‘if you do vote, 
you can’t complain.’ It is no coincidence that the emergence of the 
philosophical concept of the ‘Social Contract’ runs parallel to 
democratic development in the modern era.
In political philosophy the social contract or political contract
 is a theory or model, originating during the Age of Enlightenment, that
 typically addresses the questions of the origin of society and the 
legitimacy of the authority of the state over the individual. Social 
contract arguments typically posit that individuals have consented, 
either explicitly or tacitly, to surrender some of their freedoms and 
submit to the authority of the ruler or magistrate (or to the decision 
of a majority), in exchange for protection of their remaining rights. 
The question of the relation between natural and legal rights, 
therefore, is often an aspect of social contract theory.
Democracy legitimises authority.
 Every time you vote you sign the Social Contract.
If
 you vote and your ‘favoured’ candidate does not win, you have 
absolutely no right to complain because by voting you have accepted the 
process and are bound by it’s result. It is not a coincidence 
either that you are asked to put a cross, also used as a replacement for
 a signature for a person who is illiterate and thus cannot write their 
name, next to your choice on the ballot.
The
 policy differences between different candidates are exaggerated. This 
encourages you to sign the Social Contract by making you believe that 
you have a real choice. But the choice is an illusion because the true 
policy differences are slight and 99% of leadership is management, 
keeping the bureaucratic apparatus of state moving and reacting to 
events.
For the overwhelming majority 
it makes little difference which candidate wins any election. Only the 
wealthy and powerful who can expect some kind of reward, in the form of 
patronage or largesse, Government contracts etc, for their financial, 
political, and media support have a dog in the fight.
Your role, by voting, is to legitimise this corruption.
Democracy
 encourages short-termism. Instead of our leaders planning for a 
sustainable future they pander to a selfish and fickle electorate who 
only want jam today and who will punish any politician at the polls who 
does not give it to them. As a consequence the farsighted, 
fairminded and responsible leadership that the world needs in the 21st 
century, is completely absent, made obsolete by an evolutionary process 
which rewards the shortsighted, corrupt, ambitious, greedy, and vain.
This
 is a genuine story, In 1974 in the UK there were two general election. 
The first in February was inconclusive and it led to another in October.
 In the run up to this second election the leaders of all the main 
political parties made the most extraordinary undeliverable promises to 
buy the votes of the British electorate.
I
 was six years old, and attending my local infants school, when the 
teaching staff there taught me one of the most important lessons I’ve 
ever learned. They decided to hold their own school election at a 
special assembly at which all the parents were invited to attend, though
 only the children would vote. Before the assembly they took myself and a
 young girl into separate classrooms, to the young girl they explained 
the needs of the school and what changes would be beneficial to the 
pupils education,. To me they just gave one simple instruction “Just get
 elected.”
The young girl addressed the
 children, parents, and teachers and made a very sensible address, “more
 books, longer school hours, and a healthy diet”.
I, on the other hand, decided to stand on a very simple platform of “Chips (fries) everyday, and longer break times.”
The
 result will come as no surprise, I won by a landslide. As I grew older 
and began to reflect more on this the lesson became clearer. The 
electorate will always vote for what they want, rather than what they 
need. The electorate are no better than a cohort of infant school 
children.
Many forms of 
Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and 
woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it 
has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all 
those other forms that have been tried from time to time.
Sir Winston Churchill, Hansard, November 11, 1947
Aristotle
 would have disagreed with Winston Churchill. Aristotle thought that 
democracy was a perverted form of Government which served the indignant 
(or capricious) mob at the expense of the broader interests of the state
 and it’s citizens.
Voting
 for Libertarianism is oxymoronic. You can not vote for your freedom 
because the ballot is a signed contract which binds you to a 
democratic system specifically designed to defraud you of any choice. 
Only by not voting can you opt out. This does not mean that you will not
 be subject to the tyranny of the majority but you will be free.